I?m not one to usually report on insurance matters but this caught my attention: in a blog post, a Maryland man accused Progressive Auto Insurance of screwing over his family after his sister was killed when someone ran a red light.
You can read the full text over at his blog, but we?ve excerpted the major stuff below:
On June 19, 2010, my sister was driving in Baltimore when her car was struck by another car and she was killed. The other driver had run a red light and hit my sister as she crossed the intersection on the green light.
Now, I don?t discount the possibility that Katie was at fault in the accident, but it never really looked that way. The only witness who gave a statement on the day said that Katie had the light, etc. The totality of the evidence left some room for argument, but that will be the case any time there?s a catastrophic car accident that doesn?t happen underneath an array of video cameras.
One indication that the case was pretty open-and-shut was that the other guy?s insurance company looked at the situation and settled with my sister?s estate basically immediately. Now, because the other driver was underinsured, that payment didn?t amount to much, but my sister carried a policy with Progressive against the possibility of an accident with an underinsured driver. So Progressive was now on the hook for difference between the other guy?s insurance and the value of Katie?s policy.
At which point we learned the first surprising thing about Progressive: Carrying Progressive insurance and getting into an accident does not entitle you to the value of your insurance policy?
? In Maryland, you may not sue an insurance company when they refuse to fork over your money. Instead, what they had to do was sue the guy who killed my sister, establish his negligence in court, and then leverage that decision to force Progressive to pay the policy.
Now my parents don?t harbor much venom for the guy who killed my sister. It was an accident, and kicking that guy around won?t bring Katie back. But kicking that guy around was the only way to get Progressive to pay. So they filed a civil suit against the other driver in hopes that, rather than going to court, Progressive would settle. Progressive did not. Progressive made a series of offers (never higher than 1/3 the amount they owe) and then let it go to a trial.
At the trial, the guy who killed my sister was defended by Progressive?s legal team.
If you are insured by Progressive, and they owe you money, they will defend your killer in court in order to not pay you your policy.
Again, the blog is here, but what do you D&T readers think? Is this Progressive being an insurance company and following the rules or are they showing no heart?
jonestown john dillinger carlos zambrano clemson pellet gun clay aiken zambrano
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.